Macedonia name dispute: Are the stars aligning for a new U.S. push?

- Advertisement -

In the shadow of the failed Cyprus talks, another critical regional issue for Greece and the Western Balkans is apparently coming back into sharp focus: the long-running dispute over the official name of that country called interchangeably “The Republic of Macedonia” (by many world powers) or “The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” (FYROM) as recognized by the UN and a number of countries but especially Greece and Cyprus.
Since the change of government in Skopje in late May, it is easily possible to list a growing number of reasons why Skopje’s Euro-Atlantic aspirations of joining the EU and NATO might be coming into reach. And there is certainly an expectation that Zoran Zaev’s new multi-ethnic coalition government in Skopje will be extended every possible helping hand. And of course, resolution of the Greece-Macedonia name dispute is the key to unlocking almost all of the Euro-Atlantic support efforts that would anchor the country in Europe and NATO.
Washington’s interest in supporting Macedonia’s integration process could not be clearer, especially since the State Department as of late has had much to say about Russian Malign Influence (RMI) in the Western Balkans and has calibrated its assistance strategies for countries in the region to counter Russian destabilization initiatives wherever possible.
As the Greek side clearly recognizes the need to support full Macedonian integration into Euro-Atlantic structures as well as the general objective of countering Russian mischief in the Balkans, one would hope that Athens and Skopje will be able to generate movement on the name dispute without too much external interference. That seems to be happening now, and in the coming days and weeks we will have a clearer view of the U.S. and EU role in all of this. Skopje wasted no time in dispatching Foreign Minister (and former negotiator for the name dispute) Nikola Dimitrov to Athens in mid-June for consultations with Greek Foreign Minister Nikos Kotzias. It seems both countries recognized the need to jump-start the process even before UN Special Envoy for the name dispute Matthew Nimetz could engage. He visited Skopje July 2-4 after a three-year absence, and is meeting Greek FM Kotzias July 17 in Brussels, after a hoped-for early July Athens meeting failed to materialize.
In the past, practically any mission Matthew Nimetz undertook on the name dispute was tightly coordinated with Washington. Although the players in the State Department have all rotated through the years, there is no reason to think that close coordination isn’t occurring already and that he isn’t working on a program for high-level meetings on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly (UNGA) meetings in September, despite low expectations for quick results voiced when he was in Skopje.
So what of an enhanced American role in bringing the dispute to a resolution? Time will tell, but the stars appear to have aligned in a positive formation. The U.S. State Department is of course nowhere near full strength in terms of senior political appointees, but the career officers in place are fully qualified to take advantage of the current positive political situation. In fact there has been a rumor for some time that the current Deputy Assistant Secretary responsible for Balkan issues is to be assigned to Skopje as Ambassador whenever the heavily bogged-down system for transferring diplomatic personnel in Washington permits it. This likely means the resolution of the name issue would clearly become one of the top operational priorities for the European Bureau at State.
The U.S. is in a particularly strong position to persuade the Tsipras government in Athens to move towards a rapid solution. Recalling that PM Tsipras will be visiting Washington in the near future, progress on the name dispute will be an important regional issue and near the top of the agenda. Recalling also that the Syriza party’s coalition government partner ANEL (Independent Greeks) has voiced serious concerns about any compound name – (upper-Macedonia, etc.) formulation in an eventual solution, the U.S. Government could help clinch a deal with number of quiet bilateral commitments to Athens. These can ultimately make sense because all parties to these negotiations agree on the need to bolster democratic development in Skopje and to contain Russian efforts in the region. It will be up to the experienced diplomats in Athens, Skopje, Washington, Brussels and New York to figure out precisely what kinds of sweeteners could be sufficient (we can think of a half dozen) to increase Athens’ confidence and allow progress towards an agreement.

- Advertisement -

Subscribe to our newsletter

CEO/Editor-in-Chief.  Former US diplomat with previous assignments in Eastern Europe, the UN, SE Asia, Greece, across the Balkans, as well as Washington DC.

Latest

Don't miss

How the arrest of a French politician carries lessons for Brussels

A French senator caught smuggling 22 kilos of tobacco...

Go West: Azerbaijan boosts energy projects that connect Caspian region with Europe

As energy demand grows fueled by AI and vehicle...

What to do about Nord Stream?

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told a press conference with...

Washington orders sanctions responding to ICC actions targeting the United States and Israel

On June 5, the United States announced sanctions against four judges currently serving as International Criminal Court (ICC) judges for what it described as...

U.S. – Venezuela standoff continues amid growing pressure

The standoff between the U.S. and Venezuela over a number of open issues is slowly reaching the boiling point, while Secretary of State Marco...

Terrific or Terrible Tariffs with the Sorcerer’s Apprentice

There is a very good chance that most of you will have seen the Walt Disney’s animation film Fantasia, which came out in 1940,...

United Kingdom and the Republic of Mauritius resolve the Chagos Islands issue

The United Kingdom agreed on May 22 to transfer sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, after a last-minute legal challenge was thrown out...

In search of jobs and treasure: Trump’s first overseas jaunt takes a distinctly commercial angle

U.S. President Donald Trump completed a four-day tour of the Middle East on May 13-16, visiting Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates....

What chance for peace in Sudan?

The conflict in Sudan has raged for two years, causing immense human suffering, regional instability, arms proliferation and massive displacement of the population. South...

False economy: Washington will regret closing important diplomatic posts

At this point many readers will have seen press reports indicating that a large number of American embassies and consulates are being studied for...

The Geoeconomic Repercussions of Trump’s Tariff Pause: A Balkan Perspective

On April 2, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump announced sweeping tariffs under the banner of “Liberation Day”—a dramatic economic maneuver that reintroduced a 10...