The Berlin Libyan Conference fiasco

EPA-EFE/OMER MESSINGER
German Chancellor Angela Merkel (C) and participants of the International Libya Conference pose for a family picture in Berlin, Germany, 19 January 2020. By means of the 'Berlin Process', German government seeks to support the peace efforts of the United Nations (UN) to bring about an end to the conflict in Libya. Following the renewed outbreak of hostilities in April 2019, UN presented a plan to stop further military escalation and resume an intra-Libyan process of reconciliation.

- Advertisement -

The Berlin Libyan Conference ended on January 19, it left the impression of a public policy exercise set by Germany in an effort to reclaim its leading role in Europe. However, the conference did not yield a result which would justify its purpose, as no ceasefire was agreed. The conference was successful in the sense that the organisers managed to get both belligerent parties, not to speak directly to each other but to speak separately with all other actors, which is quite something. The conference concluded with a document, a kind of roadmap showing how to achieve a durable ceasefire (if and when), and this is also positive.
The Berlin Conference underlined the fact that after the decision of German Chancellor Angela Merkel to retire, after the end of her current term, Germany is rapidly losing its protagonist character in Europe. It also revealed that the German lead role in Europe after the UK withdrawal from the bloc was not replaced by France, despite the efforts and the initiatives of President Emmanuel Macron, as his country is dominated by its own poorly managed national socio-economic problems.
We should not forget that after Brexit, France will be the only EU member state permanently on the UN Security Council.  The bloc, after losing the stability provided by the political presence of Merkel, begun navigating in unchartered waters and the ship has no rudder. The conference simply confirmed that.
The Libyan Civil War is a highly complicated geopolitical issue of extremely significant economic importance to Europe, and there are already many players involved. So many that it is difficult to come to an agreement. Some of those players seem to have an unstated but clear interest in controlling the energy flow to Europe for political gain.
The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 lasted 12 days and was diffused because only two parties were involved, the United States and the Soviet Union. Cuba was not involved in the talks as it had no access to the Soviet nuclear facilities. In the case of Libya, besides the belligerent parties, Egypt, Russia, the US, and Turkey have a say while the European Union is claiming a role without, however, having an army to back its claims.
Despite the wishful thinking of the conference participants, the Libyan conflict has the potential to develop into a new Lebanon if a clear winner does not soon emerge from the conflict. The Libyan problem has an important impact in the European Union as Libya is a major oil producer of sulfur-free crude. In this context, at the very same time that the conference was going on, the leader of the Libyan National Army (NLA), General Khalifa Haftar, shut down a major oil pipeline and stopped all oil exports from ports under his control. NLA controls most of the country except the capital Tripoli and its surroundings and it also controls most of the oil fields, giving it substantial economic leverage.
The Berlin Conference unanimously agreed, as Merkel said, to respect the arms embargo set by the UN and to control it more effectively than it has been in the past. Such a decision clearly implies that the Conference decided to keep equal distances from the belligerent parties, despite previous open support to Libya’s UN-recognised Government of National Accord (GNA) under Prime Minister Fayez al-Sarraj. This stance paves the way to build relations with General Haftar, who now seems to have a greater chance to win the war.
The European Union is trying to remain in the picture of the Libyan crisis as a primary actor. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and EU High Representative Josep Borrell committed to play an important role in finding a solution to the Libyan Civil War and are ready to contribute “to the monitoring of the ceasefire and the respect of the arms embargo.”
Which ceasefire and with what army the EU will support its role, however, remains an open question as neither von der Leyen nor foreign policy chief Borrell provided any details.

- Advertisement -

Subscribe to our newsletter

Latest

Kazakhstan accelerates digital transformation with new visa options

Upgrading its visa regime for skilled foreign workers and...

A Code of Conduct for the HR Outsourcing sector

The quote - often attributed to Deng Xiaoping -...

T is for tariffs

If the quick freeze and attempted shut down of...

EU officially implements landmark AI law

The EU officially implemented its new landmark AI law...

Don't miss

Kazakhstan accelerates digital transformation with new visa options

Upgrading its visa regime for skilled foreign workers and...

A Code of Conduct for the HR Outsourcing sector

The quote - often attributed to Deng Xiaoping -...

T is for tariffs

If the quick freeze and attempted shut down of...

EU officially implements landmark AI law

The EU officially implemented its new landmark AI law...

Trump administration unleashes first sanctions on Iranian shadow fleet

On February 6, the Department of the Treasury unleashed...

T is for tariffs

If the quick freeze and attempted shut down of American foreign assistance through USAID was not enough, on February 10 U.S. President Donald Trump...

EU officially implements landmark AI law

The EU officially implemented its new landmark AI law on February 2, aiming to ensure safety and ethical use of Artificial Intelligence. The European...

Trump administration unleashes first sanctions on Iranian shadow fleet

On February 6, the Department of the Treasury unleashed the first wave of the new Trump administration’s economic sanctions using the tried-and-true U.S. Government/Treasury...

Global reaction to Trump tariffs only reinforces his use of this tired and risky strategy

True to form, U.S. President Donald Trump disrupted global markets with a three-day surge of tariff announcements, border security negotiations and ultimately a 30-day...

The New Face of an Old Enemy: The renewed dangers of ISIS and al-Qaeda

A dangerous cocktail of indifference and complacency enabled al-Qaeda to evolve from a shadowy fringe network in the early 1990s into one of the...

Donald Trump is inaugurated amidst promises of security, stability and prosperity

After storming a frigid Washington D.C. during his extended inauguration festivities on January 20, Donald J Trump, America’s 47th and 45th President, launched a...

The heat is on Trump’s fossil fuel push, climate change pushback

2024 has officially been confirmed as the warmest year on record, with global temperatures surpassing the 1.5°C threshold mentioned in the Paris Agreement, Alberto...

The Biden administration’s parting gift to Russia: Still more sanctions

Clearly working overtime to underscore the Biden administration’s desire to inflict maximum economic pain on Moscow and its coterie of Ukraine invasion supporters outside...