Tuesday, July 16, 2024
 
 

The EU Green Deal is a barrier to trade and global partnerships

- Advertisement -

There is an English saying that if you can’t see the wood for the trees, then you should step back and then you will see the forest. This is a piece of advice that the EU should take to heart as their fixation with the details of sustainability policies are making them blind to the broader negative impact of their current approach.

The overarching objective of the European Union’s Green Deal is to accelerate the push towards Net Zero, reduce climate change and prevent the destruction of the environment. Leaders are striving to make Europe the first climate-neutral continent and position the EU as a global leader in fulfilling this environmental mission.

Sadly, the Green Deal is currently failing in this goal since the EU has adopted the wrong strategy to achieve this objective.

The wrong approach on sustainability

The current EU approach is both unilateral and antagonistic, with many countries – particularly in the Global South – disproportionately negatively impacted by new policies and regulations stemming from the Green Deal. The list of commodities covered by the EU Deforestation Regulation and carbon intensive products impacted by the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism are great cases in point.

Non-EU countries are forced to swallow a whole new set of rules that have been formulated in isolation, behind their backs, with no possibility for input. This is regardless of whether they have a positive or negative contribution to global environmental objectives. Delivering this type of fait accompli builds only resentment in the global community, rather than incentivises and inspires action. The current anger and outrage being expressed by third countries towards the EU bears testament to this. As a result, the EU is failing in its twin goals of improving the environment globally, and positioning itself as a positive global leader.

The European Union would instead be better served building a global consensus by establishing a dialogue and engaging countries in the regulatory and standard-setting process. Going further, this should cover the recognition of global norms and underline that countries have differentiated levels of responsibility in reaching the overall objective.

Trade is the forgotten element

Brussels should leave its current isolationist path and engage with friendly democracies across the globe to strengthen trade and promote open markets. In a world increasingly marked by polarization and fragmentation, it is more important than ever before that the EU sets a good example and acts as an open and global trading partner, rather than a “Fortress Europe.” This is fundamental to the ethos of the EU but also represents enlightened self-interest in that friendly democratic countries are large markets for European products and services with significant, skilled populations which also enjoy high growth rates. This runs in direct contrast to the low growth and rapidly aging populations that make up the majority of Europe.

Time for an EU reset

Europe should follow a path to inclusion and collaboration, rather than inflexibility and isolationism. By pivoting to a new approach, the EU should extend a welcoming hand to the the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, or ASEAN, and realize that they have an integral constructive role to play in the green transition. They are part of the solution, rather than part of the problem, and if the EU recognizes this and changes their approach, there are a number of willing partners across the ASEAN region, for example, who are prepared to engage and work towards the same goals in a spirit of partnership rather than enmity.

Given the broader political movements that are underway at the global level it is vital that the EU starts seeing the wood for the trees.

Europe needs to meet sustainability goals while increasing trade with the Global South. To do so effectively, though, it needs to drop its current approach which is both one-sided and hostile. With regards to the implementation of existing and ongoing regulation, more active engagement and dialogue is needed with partner countries.

Increasing sustainability and trade should not be mutually exclusive goals and the EU’s Green Deal need not be a byword for protectionism and intransigence.

- Advertisement -

Subscribe to our newsletter

Latest

Policies on Deforestation Show Europe’s Internal Splits

Former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger once famously...

NATO Summit: “Trump-proofing” Ukraine support while Biden appearances under a microscope

The July 9-11 NATO Summit was originally envisioned as...

Russia failing to replace lucrative European gas deliveries with sales to China

Russia’s attempts to build the Power of Siberia 2...

Astana SCO Summit reaffirms its growing geopolitical role

The 24th summit of the Council of Heads of...

Don't miss

Policies on Deforestation Show Europe’s Internal Splits

Former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger once famously...

NATO Summit: “Trump-proofing” Ukraine support while Biden appearances under a microscope

The July 9-11 NATO Summit was originally envisioned as...

Russia failing to replace lucrative European gas deliveries with sales to China

Russia’s attempts to build the Power of Siberia 2...

Astana SCO Summit reaffirms its growing geopolitical role

The 24th summit of the Council of Heads of...

Uzbekistan: A Key Player in the (Central Asian) Great Game

Uzbekistan has had considerable success in attracting billions of...

Policies on Deforestation Show Europe’s Internal Splits

Former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger once famously asked the question “Who do I call if I want to call Europe?” to highlight...

NATO Summit: “Trump-proofing” Ukraine support while Biden appearances under a microscope

The July 9-11 NATO Summit was originally envisioned as a celebration of the alliance’s 75th anniversary at the organization’s founding venue in Washington D.C.,...

Russia failing to replace lucrative European gas deliveries with sales to China

Russia’s attempts to build the Power of Siberia 2 (PS-2) natural gas pipeline to China appear to be stalling despite repeated statements from Moscow...

Astana SCO Summit reaffirms its growing geopolitical role

The 24th summit of the Council of Heads of State of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), chaired by Kazakhstan, took place on July 4...

Uzbekistan: A Key Player in the (Central Asian) Great Game

Uzbekistan has had considerable success in attracting billions of dollars of aid, concessional debt, and co-investment, which has helped transform the economy since 2017....

EU strengthens energy cooperation with Chile, Argentina

This week EU Energy Commissioner Kadri Simson visited Chile and Argentina to step up cooperation with these two countries in the energy field, with...

Jeffrey Sachs: three times a traitor

An economist with an international reputation, Professor Jeffrey Sachs has increasingly raised his profile in the world media. A U.S. citizen, he accuses his...

Japan, the Republic of Korea (ROK), and the U.S. condemn DPRK-Russia Cooperation

During his June 19-20 visit to Pyongyang, Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un signed a comprehensive strategic partnership treaty...