Imagine leaving your homeland to escape tyranny, only to find the oppressive regime you fled can still reach you, manipulating your financial lifelines. This is the reality for many Hong Kong activists in exile.
China’s crackdown on democracy in Hong Kong has transcended borders, instilling fear among activists who dare to champion freedom. These brave individuals face threats of kidnapping and imprisonment even after fleeing to other countries.
Now, more than ever, the EU must step up to protect these brave individuals by fortifying financial protections and pressuring banks to stand against Beijing’s relentless repression. The fate of Hong Kong’s activists depends on it. This is not just a matter of financial security but a crucial stand for human rights and democracy.
In 1997, when Hong Kong was returned to China, Beijing promised to preserve the city’s freedom and democracy under the “One Country, Two Systems” principle. However, Xi Jinping’s regime shattered this promise, pushing through laws which effectively ended democracy in Hong Kong during the Covid-19 pandemic. Advocates of democracy now face life imprisonment. The once vibrant protests have been silenced, bookstores have closed, media outlets have shut down, and even songs are banned.
Fleeing to the U.K. under the British National Overseas Passport program has not provided the safety Hong Kong activists hoped for. Xi’s regime has placed bounties on prominent democracy advocates, putting them and their families in constant danger.
Beijing’s influence extends globally through Confucius Institutes in universities, which function as surveillance hubs, creating a climate of fear that stifles free speech and academic freedom. The insidiousness of this repression is multifaceted: surveillance by fellow students, fear of repercussions for family members in China, and the threat of visa cancellations create an environment where freedom of speech is stifled.
Hong Kong activists in exile face a new form of repression: financial strangulation. Western banks, complying with Beijing’s national security laws, have frozen the assets of activists like Ted Hui. This is deeply troubling as it shows a willingness among Western financial institutions to enable politically motivated asset freezes.
Hui’s assets, held by HSBC, remain frozen despite his efforts to access them. Similarly, Manulife has obstructed the funds of another activist, demonstrating a troubling trend of Western financial institutions acquiescing to politically motivated asset freezes. This financial repression severely hampers activists’ ability to support themselves and continue their advocacy, violating the foundational principles of freedom and democracy.
Europe has an obligation to support Hong Kong activists by strengthening financial protections and ensuring that Western banks do not comply with politically motivated asset freezes.
The EU should implement stricter financial regulations to prevent banks from freezing assets based on politically motivated charges, establish a financial support fund for activists whose assets have been unjustly frozen, and leverage diplomatic channels to pressure Western banks to resist Beijing’s repressive tactics.
Additionally, the EU should consider imposing sanctions on financial institutions which comply with China’s repressive policies and provide legal support to activists seeking to challenge the unjust freezing of their assets.
This support is essential for those who have sacrificed everything for freedom and democracy—values the EU deeply cherishes. Now is the time for the EU to act, standing in solidarity with Hong Kong activists and defending the principles of liberty and democracy.
By enforcing stricter regulations and accountability measures, the EU can reinforce its commitment to democratic values and ensure that financial institutions uphold human rights standards, thereby protecting those who risk their lives for freedom.
The EU must act now. Strengthen financial protections for Hong Kong activists. Pressure banks to resist Beijing’s repression. Stand up for democracy and human rights. The fate of Hong Kong’s brave activists depends on it.
