Threatening to seize Gazprom’s assets, Ukraine raises the stakes for EU gas

However, Kiev needs the goodwill of European leaders while Moscow is also looking to improve both trade and political relations with the core EU states, Weafer tells New Europe

- Advertisement -

As the gas dispute between Russia and Ukraine deepens, Kiev is reportedly planning to seize the Ukrainian assets of Russian gas monopoly Gazprom in the former Soviet republic. Moreover, Ukrainian diplomatic missions were reportedly instructed to locate the assets of Gazprom as Kiev embarked in a global search of the Russian company’s foreign assets.

“I think that neither from legal nor practical perspective the seizure of Gazprom’s assets – apart from inside Ukraine – is realistic whereas Ukraine/Naftogaz (Ukraine’s national oil and gas company) is damaging itself with such rhetoric,” Katja Yafimava, a senior research fellow at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, told New Europe on March 23.

As a result of the judgment handed down in separate cases brought before the Stockholm Arbitration Court, Gazprom owes Ukraine $2.6 billion, Chris Weafer, a partner at Macro-Advisory, a Moscow-based consultancy, told New Europe on March 23, reminding that they lost a case for $4.6 billion and won one for $2 billion.

“With the threat of asset confiscation, Ukraine is raising the stakes and hoping to either get payment or, at least, a negotiated solution,” Weafer said, recalling that Russia has an existing judgment, obtained in a London court, against the Ukraine government for the non-payment of the $3 billion it loaned Ukraine in December 2013.

“Ukraine is very likely taking advantage of the deterioration in political relations between Moscow and the US/EU as a result of sanctions escalation and the poisoning of the ex-spy in England in the hope it will get backing from the EU to force Russia into either paying or negotiating a broad debt settlement,” Weafer said.

Justin Urquhart-Stewart, founder of London’s Seven Investment Management, told New Europe on March 23 that Russia could “react extremely aggressively” against Ukraine and Western Europe if Gazprom’s assets were seized. The seizure of Gazprom’s assets “tied together to what Brussels has been saying supporting Britain with regards to the nerve gas attack in Salisbury, England, and the support from the EU … could make Russia angry to threaten or significantly constrict the amount of gas being shipped to Europe,” Urquhart-Stewart said.

Weafer said, however, it is most unlikely that Ukraine will take any action against Gazprom assets, in any jurisdiction that would risk cutting gas supplies to the EU. “Kiev needs the goodwill of European leaders, and the IMF (International Monetary Fund), if it is to avoid the risk of another financial crisis and to get the help it needs to grow the economy,” he said.

He explained that Moscow is also looking to improve both trade and political relations with the core EU states. “The political relationship with the US and UK continues to deteriorate but trade with Europe is growing and investment from EU states into Russia has also been recovering over the past two years,” Weafer said, adding that Moscow will also be careful not to be cast into the role of energy villain and damage hopes for an improved relationship with the major EU states.

“Both Kiev and Moscow have a lot to lose if either is seen to mishandle the dispute or refuses to look for a resolution. Kiev is making the first move and we now wait to see what will be Moscow’s response,” he added.

According to Weafer, this dispute, and the implied threat to EU gas deliveries, is improving the prospects for Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline from Russia to Germany. He reminded that Berlin reacted to the 2009 gas dispute with Nord Stream-1 in order to improve its energy security. “It has no issue with Moscow as a reliable energy partner but has concerns over the transit routes that cross other countries. Nord Stream-2 would almost eliminate the transit risk and make Germany almost energy secure,” Weafer said.

Yafimava said she doesn’t think the dispute will accelerate Nord Stream-2. She anticipates that the European Commission “will continue its attempts to if not prevent its construction, which it really cannot, then at least to limit its utilization, for example via the Gas Directive amendment.”

She opined that it is self-defeating on part of the European Commission “because it cannot really be sure it will be able to broker a post 2019 – or earlier if the tribunal decides to annul the contracts prior to their expiry – transit arrangement. In any event Gazprom will need to transit gas across Ukraine post 2019 even if Nord Stream-2 is built.”

follow on twitter @energyinsider

- Advertisement -

Subscribe to our newsletter

Co-founder / Director of Energy & Climate Policy and Security at NE Global Media

Latest

On the two-year anniversary, G7 Foreign Ministers address the devastating war in Sudan

After nearly 23 months of war, on March 21,...

Doom, gloom or boom?

While it is an almost painful daily task to...

Don't miss

On the two-year anniversary, G7 Foreign Ministers address the devastating war in Sudan

After nearly 23 months of war, on March 21,...

Doom, gloom or boom?

While it is an almost painful daily task to...

Romania utilizing all available resources to boost its energy independence

Romania is using all energy resources available, including natural...

Ahead of nuclear talks, Trump administration orders new sanctions on Iran’s shadow fleet and Chinese refiners

Washington’s sanctions campaign of “maximum pressure on Iran” is intensifying, despite the start of initial discussions between the U.S. and Iran over nuclear issues...

Romania utilizing all available resources to boost its energy independence

Romania is using all energy resources available, including natural gas as the country advances rapidly with Neptun Deep gas project and new wind and...

Germany removes key debt brake budget limits in historic move

Rushing to arrive at a workable arrangement before the new post-election German parliament convened on March 25, Friedrich Merz’s victorious CDU/CSU bloc and the...

Apollo Funds to partner with BP on TANAP gas pipeline from Azerbaijan to Turkey

British energy company BP said on March 21 it has reached agreements for Apollo-managed funds to purchase a 25 percent non-controlling stake in BP...

Caspian-Black Sea Green Energy Corridor countries push project forward

The Ministers of Azerbaijan, Georgia, Hungary and Romania met in Budapest on March 10, where they signed a joint letter to EU Energy Commissioner...

Ignoring Russia, latest Trump administration Iran sanctions increase pressure on an old enemy

On March 13, the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned (“designated” in OFAC language) Iran’s Minister of Petroleum, Mohsen...

EU signs critical raw materials, energy and infrastructure deals with Kazakhstan

As part of the visit of EU Commissioner for International Partnerships Jozef Síkela to Astana, the European Union and Kazakhstan signed on March 13...

Weaning Europe off its Russian gas addiction

The Viking hero Ragnar Lodbrok once said “don't waste your time looking back. You're not going that way.” The words of the former king...