Thursday, March 28, 2024
 
 

Trump unveils his “Hard Power Budget” delineating elements of an American withdrawal from global leadership, if approved

- Advertisement -

The screaming had already started well before President Trump revealed his proposals for a “Hard Power Budget” March 16, since the main budget outlines had been circulated to Federal agencies and Departments around the end of February. Thus there were few surprises about the general approach, and the losers in the first phase of the budget process have had several weeks to get their positions organized. You can expect to be deluged with a growing list of passionate appeals from important, intelligent and powerful people from all walks of life — for just about every program that faces Trump’s proposed cuts. In the Washington budget process, the more debate the better.

What we learned Thursday

With the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) release of the 64-page document entitled “America First – A Budget Blueprint to Make America Great Again” we have our first good look at how the Trump Administration wants to handle the Federal Government’s discretionary spending, that is, the budget not including so-called “entitlements” like social security, welfare payments and Medicare and related programs. In Washington they call the outline “the skinny budget,” as the primary document won’t be ready until May.
Trump’s budget proposal aims to avoid increasing the overall deficit so it is essentially a reorganization of existing total spending. The $54 billion boost in defense spending we learned about last month remains in the budget outline, but the funding cuts from other federal programs to allow this increase are massive. And it is not so much a case of simply cutting foreign assistance and diplomacy to support defense and domestic security, it is about cutting sizeable chunks out of most Federal agencies’ lower priority programs, at least for Trump’s OMB team.
Here are some examples of the domestic cuts we are now reading about before we turn to international programs: The Trump OMB outline describes cuts in funding for the Environmental Protection Agency (-31%), the Department of Housing and Urban Development (-13%), and the Department of Agriculture (-21%), and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (to be reduced sharply) among others. The OMB’s Director Mick Mulvaney made this now infamous comment on March 15: “There’s a lot of programs that simply cannot justify their existence and that’s where we zeroed in.” The Trump Administration also plans to completely eliminate Federal funding for 19 agencies and commissions.
With proposed cuts of this degree, the battles and lobbying for some budget items will be furious. It will be months before anything approaching final figures are reached through the congressional appropriations process, even with a Republican-controlled Congress. And first reactions from Trump’s supposed Republican allies have been loudly negative, according to The Washington Post. Confidently recalling congressional control of the budget process, one senior Republican budget expert noted “Presidents’ propose, Congress disposes.”

What of America’s international role?

The message of disdain for many but not all of America’s global commitments comes through loud and clear in the budget outline, even as money is being shifted around from all sources to allow for a start on the construction on the Mexican border wall. Fortunately, no cutbacks for U.S. Embassy security programs abroad are planned. Not wanting to generate nightmares, here are a just few of the key cuts proposed in the budget outline, and hopefully they will not survive the appropriations process in any recognizable form:
Sending shockwaves to the UN, the budget outline reduces funding to the UN and affiliated agencies, including UN peacekeeping and other international organizations, by setting the expectation that these organizations rein in costs and that the funding burden be shared more fairly among members. The amount the U.S. would contribute to the UN budget would be reduced and the U.S. would not contribute more than 25 percent for UN peacekeeping costs.
The budget outline eliminates the Global Climate Change Initiative and fulfills President Trump’s pledge to cease payments to the UN’s climate change programs by eliminating U.S. funding related to the Green Climate Fund and its two precursor Climate Investment Funds.
The budget outline reduces State Department Educational and Cultural Exchange budget sharply, but retains Fulbright Program funding.
The outline refocuses economic and development assistance to countries of greatest strategic importance to the U.S. and “ensures the effectiveness of U.S. taxpayer investments” by rightsizing funding across countries and sectors. It’s almost impossible to decode this but the consequences can be drastic. We are already hearing that USAID’s senior management is essentially frozen in a somnambulant “caretaker” status.
Funding cuts would also be felt in programs administered by the US Treasury Department. The outline reduces funding for multilateral development banks, including the World Bank, by approximately $650 million over three years compared to commitments made by the Obama Administration. Even with the proposed decreases, the U.S. would retain its current status as a top donor.
Also of note, the budget outline provides $3.1 billion to meet the security assistance commitment to Israel, currently at an all-time high; ensuring that Israel has the ability to defend itself from threats and maintain its “qualitative military edge.”

- Advertisement -

Subscribe to our newsletter

CEO/Editor-in-Chief.  Former US diplomat with previous assignments in Eastern Europe, the UN, SE Asia, Greece, across the Balkans, as well as Washington DC.

Latest

U.S. condemns latest PRC actions in South China Sea as dangerous

Coming just days after U.S. Secretary of State Antony...

With Sweden now a NATO member, what’s next?

Sweden completed the necessary diplomatic formalities on March 7,...

Inaugural B5+1 Forum launched to boost regional trade and investment

On March 13-15, government policymakers, business leaders, experts, and...

U.S. zeroes in on Houthi revenue sources

The U.S. Government made several announcements this month regarding...

Don't miss

U.S. condemns latest PRC actions in South China Sea as dangerous

Coming just days after U.S. Secretary of State Antony...

With Sweden now a NATO member, what’s next?

Sweden completed the necessary diplomatic formalities on March 7,...

Inaugural B5+1 Forum launched to boost regional trade and investment

On March 13-15, government policymakers, business leaders, experts, and...

U.S. zeroes in on Houthi revenue sources

The U.S. Government made several announcements this month regarding...

EU adopts safeguards on general purpose artificial intelligence

The European Parliament took an important step in regulating...

U.S. condemns latest PRC actions in South China Sea as dangerous

Coming just days after U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken visited Manila (March 19), Washington released on March 23 a strongly worded statement of...

Inaugural B5+1 Forum launched to boost regional trade and investment

On March 13-15, government policymakers, business leaders, experts, and investors from C5+1 countries inaugurated the first-ever Business 5+1 (B5+1) Forum which was held in...

U.S. zeroes in on Houthi revenue sources

The U.S. Government made several announcements this month regarding new sanctions on Houthi revenue sources, building on steps taken in coordination with the U.K....

U.S. joins International Coalition for the Return of Ukrainian Children

On March 7, the office of the spokesperson at the U.S. Department of State issued a media note, clearly meant to be circulated in...

Intellexa Commercial Spyware Consortium sanctioned

The U.S. Government announced on March 5 a new set of sanctions on the members of the Intellexa Commercial Spyware Consortium based across Europe....

Zimbabwe: U.S. reconfigures sanctions to focus on corruption and human rights

On March 4, three separate U.S. Government Departments/Agencies issued Zimbabwe-specific sanctions guidance, demonstrating how complex and intertwined U.S. sanctions legislation has become and how...

Russia sanctions remain a powerful tool to support Ukraine’s defense

Western leaders should not dismiss the two-year long sanctions campaign (as opposed to the 2014 Crimea sanctions) as unsuccessful simply because the Kremlin has...

New U.S. Russia sanctions widen scope, adding 500 new targets

The U.S. State Department released a comprehensive list of new sanctions measures on February 23, clearly the culmination of months of preparation in order...